Context
Most of the value in prediction markets is not in the gambling side of them, but on the information embedded in the markets.
A prediction-market platform that can produce forecasts-as-a-service would have enormous value. There’s people willing to pay for accurate forecasts to their questions. However, neither Manifold nor other markets currently solve this problem at scale.
Problem Statement
- In Manifold Markets, the questions which are most relevant to the userbase get the highest betting volumes. It incentivizes markets on:
- Topical issues (current examples: Elon’s twitter acquisition, Russia-Ukrainian conflict, stable-coin crashes, etc).
- Topics relevant to the forecasting userbase (Effective-altruism related markets, AI-risk markets, meta-markets about Manifold/PredictionMarkets, etc)
- Personal markets made by people known to the userbase (Scott Alexander, cofounders, Aella, Nuno, etc).
- Mega-mainstream stuff (Sports, presidential races, etc).
- But markets that don’t fit these categories get barely any betting volume.
- Markets narrowly relevant to the creator.
- Markets that are broadly-relevant but not to the existing userbase.
- Anything in between
- The creator can add liquidity to a dead market, but it only weakly incentivizes bets, and it makes the market less accurate.
- There should be a way for any user to reliably get high-quality forecasts for any question they ask.
The Idea
MVP: Play-money prize pools
-
Allow market creators to add a $M prize-pool to their questions.
- Allow any other user to donate $M to the prize-pool as well.
-
Distribute the prize-pool among the people that bet correctly (proportionally)
- Naive Example (doesn’t necessarily have to be this mechanism)
- In a particular market, Alice won 50$M, Bob won 20$M, Charlie won 30$M.
- But the market had a 1000$M prize-pool, which also gets distributed proportionally at closing time. So Alice additionally gets 500$M, Bob 200$M, Charlie 300$M.
-
Benefits:
- Lets market creators incentivize betting as much as they want.
- The larger the prize-pool, the more upside for bettors without any extra risk.
- Bettors are still incentivized to be forecast accurately.
- Potential growth in the number of markets created daily, as the platform can now reliably answer more questions.
-
Open questions, limitations & Problems

- One mechanism would be to distribute the prize-pool at resolution time, proportional to earnings
- Toggle for example
- But users wouldn’t be able to know which percentage of the prize-pool they’d get until resolution time (as more bets from other people could come in later)
- It might not increase the total number of bets on the platform, just redirect them to questions with the largest prize-pools.
- Game theoretic issues depending on the mechanism.
- Depending on the mechanism you might be incentivizing accurate predictions to a different degree
- Example: distributing the prize-pool equally among everyone that bets incentivizes low-effort predictions
v2.0: $USD prize pools
- Allow Real-dollar ($USD) prize pools instead.
- Distribute the $USD prize-pool among the people that bet correctly (at resolution time, proportionally to their bets).
- Example (with naive mechanism)
- In a particular market, Alice won 50$M, Bob won 20$M, Charlie won 30$M.
- But the market had a 1000$USD prize-pool, which also gets distributed proportionally at closing time. So Alice additionally gets 500$USD, Bob 200$USD, Charlie 300$USD.
- Benefits:
- Lets market creators incentivize as much betting volume as they want.
- Think 10USD prize-pool, vs 1000USD, vs 100K USD.
- Grows DAU.
- The larger the prize-pools in the website, the more “free-money” lying around. Users will flock to the platform to predict, and get money.
- Compensates forecasters for their work.
- Limitations & Problems
- The same problems as with the MVP would apply
- Creates a strong incentive to create multiple accounts and use the free 1000$M repeatedly.
- You probably (?) run into gambling regulators if you allow people to bet Mana they bought with USD, rather than earned